Hiring a trademark lawyer typically costs between $750 and $2,500 in attorney fees for a standard US filing, plus $350 or more per class in USPTO government filing fees.
The total you’ll pay depends on the scope of work: how thorough a clearance search you need, how many marks and classes you’re filing, whether you require international protection, and whether your matter involves responding to USPTO refusals or third-party challenges. At The Social Media Law Firm, we charge a flat fee of $1500 for a trademark clearance search and filing, plus government filing fees.
Below is a current breakdown of trademark lawyer fees, the variables that move the price up or down, real-world scenarios with cost ranges, and how flat-fee pricing differs from hourly billing.
Current attorney fee ranges across common trademark services, separated from the USPTO government filing fees. Attorney fee ranges reflect typical US market rates.
| Service Type | Typical 2026 Range | USPTO Filing Fees (Separate) |
|---|---|---|
| Filing-only (single mark, single class) | $500 – $1,000 attorney fee | $350+ per class |
| Full-service filing (clearance + filing + examiner response) | $1,000 – $2,500 attorney fee | $350+ per class |
| Multi-class or multi-mark filings | $2,000 – $5,000+ attorney fee | $350+ per class per mark |
| International filings (Madrid Protocol) | $2,500 – $7,500+ attorney fee | Varies by country |
| Office action responses | $500 – $2,500+ depending on complexity | Usually no additional fee |
| Opposition / cancellation proceedings | $5,000 – $25,000+ (typically hourly) | TTAB filing fees apply |
| Trademark enforcement / cease-and-desist | $1,500 – $5,000+ for initial work | Litigation costs additional if filed |
USPTO trademark application fees are subject to change. Confirm current fees on the USPTO trademark fees page before filing.
Trademark lawyer fees vary because the work itself varies. The same lawyer might quote $750 for one matter and $5,000 for another based on the following factors:
A filing-only engagement (where the attorney prepares and submits the application) costs less than a full-service engagement that includes a clearance search, examiner correspondence, and post-registration maintenance counsel.
For most brands, full-service is the better investment. A flawed application can result in refusal or the registration being challenged later.
Each trademark application covers one mark in one or more classes of goods or services. Filing a word mark and a logo separately means two applications. Protecting a single brand across multiple product categories means multiple classes per application. Both increase cost. Attorney fees scale with applications, and USPTO fees scale with classes.
A basic knockout search confirms there are no obviously identical existing marks. A comprehensive clearance search reviews state and federal registrations, common law uses, similar phonetic or visual marks, and risk factors that could lead to refusal or opposition. The depth of search needed depends on the brand’s risk tolerance and how heavily you plan to invest in the mark.
Protecting a trademark outside the US requires separate filings in each target country, typically coordinated through the Madrid Protocol. Each country has its own fees, examination process, and timeline. International filings can multiply total costs significantly.
Not every application proceeds smoothly. The USPTO may issue an office action requiring legal argument or amendment. A third party may file an opposition or cancellation proceeding. These developments typically require additional work and can substantially increase total cost.
Trademark attorneys typically bill in one of two ways:
Flat-fee pricing: A fixed quote for a defined scope of work. You know your investment before you commit. Best for predictable matters like standard filings, clearance searches, and routine examiner responses.
Hourly billing: You pay for time spent. Necessary for unpredictable matters like opposition proceedings or complex enforcement, but it can produce surprise bills when work expands beyond initial estimates.
For most brands, flat-fee pricing on filings is the better experience: you know what you’re paying, what’s included, and what would cost extra.
Hourly billing typically only makes sense for disputes or matters where the scope genuinely cannot be predicted in advance.
Self-filing through the USPTO online portal costs only the government filing fee, but the application drafting (identifying classes correctly, describing goods and services properly, and structuring the application defensibly) is where mistakes get costly. The USPTO does not refund filing fees for refused applications.
Online services like LegalZoom or Rocket Lawyer (currently around $349–$699) sit between DIY and full attorney representation. They handle the paperwork but do not provide legal advice, clearance analysis, or strategic counsel. For a deeper analysis of this tradeoff, see our breakdown of whether to use online services like LegalZoom for trademarks.
An experienced trademark attorney provides the legal judgment that distinguishes a filing from a defensible registration: identifying conflicts before you invest in branding, structuring the application to withstand challenges, and counseling on enforcement and portfolio strategy.
The cost difference typically pays for itself the first time a clearance search prevents a costly rebrand.
The ranges below combine attorney fees and USPTO filing fees for common scenarios. Actual costs vary by attorney and matter.
| Scenario | What’s Typically Included | Total Range |
|---|---|---|
| First-time founder filing one mark (U.S. only) | Clearance search, single-class application, examiner communications | $1,100 to $1,800 |
| Small business filing word mark + logo (2 classes) | Two applications, clearance for both, examiner responses | $2,500 to $4,500 |
| Brand expanding internationally | U.S. filing plus Madrid Protocol filings in 3–5 countries | $5,000 to $12,000+ |
| Brand responding to office action | Legal argument drafted in response to USPTO refusal or requirement | $750 to $2,500+ |
| Brand enforcing against an infringer | Investigation, cease-and-desist letter, follow-up communications | $1,500 to $5,000+ |
At The Social Media Law Firm, we use flat-fee pricing for trademark filings, so you know your investment before you commit, with no surprise hourly bills. Pricing is scoped to your specific situation:
The number of marks and classes you’re filing
The depth of clearance search your matter requires
We charge $1500 in legal fees for a comprehensive trademark clearance search and filing your application in one class of goods or services. We also offer significant discounts for multiple applications for the same brand.
Whether you’re a first-time founder filing your first mark or a growing brand securing protection across multiple product lines, we’ll provide a clear, fixed quote before any work begins so you can budget accurately and decide what scope makes sense for where your brand is now.
For a single mark in a single class with attorney representation, total cost typically runs $1,100–$1,800 (attorney fee of $750–$1,500 plus USPTO filing fees of $350+).
Multiple marks and multiple classes increase the total.
For most brands, yes. The cost of a rebrand after a trademark conflict typically far exceeds the cost of attorney representation upfront. A clearance search alone can prevent investing in a brand name that’s already protected by someone else.
Scope, complexity, and billing model account for most variation. A simple flat-fee filing is predictable; an opposition proceeding billed hourly can range from $5,000 to $25,000+. Ask any attorney for a written scope and quote before engaging.
You can, but it’s usually not the savings it looks like. The USPTO does not refund filing fees for refused applications, and self-filers often misidentify classes or describe goods and services in ways that produce refusals or weak registrations. The cost of fixing those mistakes typically exceeds what an attorney would have charged upfront.
Attorney fees pay for legal work: clearance, drafting, strategy, and examiner communications. USPTO fees are government filing fees, paid directly to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and required regardless of whether you use an attorney. Both are part of the total cost of trademark protection.
Practices vary. Some attorneys offer free initial consultations to scope a potential engagement; others charge for substantive legal advice from the start. Ask about consultation policy when you first reach out.
Author
Ethan Wall, Esq.
Founding Attorney, The Social Media Law Firm
Nationally Recognized Social Media Lawyer
Legal Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
For more legal tips, give us a follow on Instagram, TikTok, Linkedin, or check out our YouTube Channel.
Subscribe to The Social Media Lawcast on Spotify Podcasts.
