User-generated content is one of the most effective tools brands have for building trust, engagement, and authentic reach. It’s also one of the easiest ways to create unintentional legal exposure.
Brands that treat UGC as free marketing material (reposting customer photos, embedding reviews in ads, running hashtag campaigns without clear terms) frequently underestimate the risk sitting beneath the surface.
When a customer creates a piece of content, like a photo, video, caption, or review, they own the copyright. Tagging your brand, using your hashtag, or posting publicly does not transfer ownership or grant a license to you. Brands that repost, embed, or repurpose UGC without explicit permission are exposed to copyright infringement claims, even when the content was created in connection with their products.
At the minimum, brands should secure written permission before featuring UGC in paid advertising and build campaign terms that clearly establish content rights.
Once a brand provides anything of value to a UGC creator, the content becomes endorsement advertising under FTC rules. The term “value” includes payment, free products, discount codes, contest entry, and affiliate links.
Both the creator and the brand carry disclosure obligations, and the FTC holds brands responsible for ensuring compliance, not just the creators. Vague language like “thanks to” or platform-native partnership tags alone do not meet the FTC’s clear-and-conspicuous disclosure standard.
UGC frequently features identifiable people other than the creator. When a brand uses that content commercially, it may need consent from those individuals separately from the consent obtained from the content creator.
State right-of-publicity laws vary significantly, with states like California and New York providing robust statutory protection. National UGC campaigns should account for the strictest applicable standard, which typically means requiring model releases when UGC features identifiable third parties.
Customer reviews, testimonials, and unboxing videos can contain claims about competitors, third parties, or products that are inaccurate, misleading, or defamatory. When a brand actively selects and republishes UGC, it can be treated as the publisher of that content rather than a passive host. This means that defamation liability can attach. Content moderation processes, clear campaign guidelines, and the ability to remove problematic UGC quickly are essential safeguards.
UGC often includes third-party logos, branded products, or competitor trademarks visible in the background or foreground. Republishing that content commercially can trigger trademark infringement claims, particularly when the use suggests an unauthorized association or creates consumer confusion. Brands that aggregate UGC at scale should screen content for third-party trademark use before republication.
Each of these risk categories has its own compliance requirements, and a single UGC campaign can implicate all five simultaneously. The right next step depends on where your brand is in its UGC program:
If you’re ready to build out a compliance framework: rights management, FTC disclosure protocols, content moderation, and AI-generated UGC considerations, our 2026 UGC compliance guide walks through the operational structures brands need to manage UGC legally at scale.
For the broader context of how UGC fits within influencer law, FTC compliance, and creator contracts, see our complete guide to influencer law.
At The Social Media Law Firm, attorney Ethan Wall helps brands, agencies, and creators run UGC campaigns that are legally sound from launch.
Whether you’re drafting campaign terms, reviewing your FTC disclosure protocols, or auditing an existing program for risk, we can help. Contact us to talk through your specific UGC questions.
No. Tagging a brand, using a branded hashtag, or posting publicly does not transfer copyright ownership or grant a license. Brands need explicit written permission before reposting UGC in paid or commercial contexts.
Whenever a brand provides anything of value to a creator in exchange for or in connection with their content. That includes payment, free products, discount codes, contest entries, and affiliate commissions. Once the incentive enters the picture, the UGC is treated as endorsement advertising and disclosure obligations apply.
Often, yes. If UGC features identifiable individuals other than the creator and is used commercially, brands may need consent from those individuals under state right-of-publicity laws. Requirements vary by state, so national campaigns typically default to the strictest applicable standard.
Author
Ethan Wall, Esq.
Founding Attorney, The Social Media Law Firm
Nationally Recognized Social Media Lawyer
Legal Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
For more legal tips, give us a follow on Instagram, TikTok, Linkedin, or check out our YouTube Channel.
Subscribe to The Social Media Lawcast on Spotify Podcasts.
