Many business owners believe that if a name is already in use, it can never be trademarked. That assumption is incorrect.
Trademark law does not prohibit registration simply because a name exists somewhere in the marketplace. The legal analysis focuses on priority, scope of use, and consumer confusion. Understanding how trademarks actually work can prevent costly mistakes and missed opportunities for brand protection.
A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol, or design that identifies the source of goods or services and distinguishes them from others in the marketplace. In the United States, trademarks are governed by the Lanham Act and administered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
Trademark rights can exist with or without registration, but federal registration provides broader legal protections, including nationwide priority and enhanced enforcement options.
Yes — in some cases. The existence of another business using a name does not automatically block trademark registration. The controlling question is whether the two uses are likely to cause consumer confusion.
The USPTO evaluates:
If confusion is unlikely, trademark registration may still be possible.
Common law trademark rights arise automatically when a business uses a name in commerce, even without filing a trademark application. These rights are recognized under U.S. law but are limited in scope.
Common law trademarks:
Federal trademark registration provides:
Common law rights, by contrast, are limited to local markets and may be overridden by a later federal registrant if proper legal conditions are met.
This distinction is critical when evaluating whether a name already in use actually blocks your ability to register a trademark.
Trademarks are registered within specific classes of goods or services. A name used in one class does not automatically prevent registration in another.
For example, the same name could potentially coexist if:
The USPTO examines whether consumers would reasonably assume the goods or services come from the same source.
Yes. Geography plays a major role, especially with common law rights. A business using a name only in a limited region may not have enforceable rights nationwide.
Federal registration, however, creates a legal presumption of nationwide ownership, even if the registrant has not yet expanded everywhere. This is why early trademark filing can be critical for growing brands.
Yes, under limited circumstances:
The USPTO may permit concurrent registrations when two parties have used similar marks in different geographic regions without confusion.
Businesses may enter private agreements defining how each party can use a similar mark, including limitations on geography, marketing channels, or product categories.
These arrangements require careful legal drafting to avoid future disputes.
If a confusingly similar mark is already federally registered in your same or related class, the USPTO will likely refuse your application. Federal registrations carry strong presumptive rights and are difficult to overcome without evidence of prior superior use or abandonment.
Before filing:
Skipping these steps often results in rejected applications or legal exposure.
Trademark law is not about who thought of a name first — it is about consumer perception. Many names coexist legally because they operate in different markets, regions, or industries. Proper legal analysis determines whether protection is possible.
If you are considering trademarking a name that is already in use, legal guidance can help you avoid denial, infringement claims, or wasted filing fees. Speak with a trademark attorney from our team before moving forward.
Possibly. Online presence alone does not establish trademark priority. The analysis depends on actual commercial use, the type of goods or services offered, and whether consumer confusion is likely.
Unregistered businesses may still have enforceable common law rights. However, those rights are limited geographically and may not block federal registration in all circumstances.
No. The USPTO evaluates similarity, not just exact matches. Names that are phonetically similar or convey similar commercial impressions may still be refused.
Author
Ethan Wall, Esq.
Founding Attorney, The Social Media Law Firm l Nationally Recognized Social Media Lawyer
Legal Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
For more legal tips, give us a follow on Instagram, TikTok, Linkedin, or check out our YouTube Channel.
Subscribe to The Social Media Lawcast on Spotify Podcasts.
